Bewertung
1,5
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
1,5von 5 · Mangelhaft
Bewertung
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
45 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Bewertungsportal
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Dennis the Menace
Avoid use for genuine reviews
Traveloguetybe
I received an email asking me to verify a review I'd written for a retailer. As I hadn't written a review or purchased anything from that retailer I assumed it was a scam. Searched on google and trust pilot and found these reviews. Seems dodgy
Matt Delfino
We use Reviews.io to collect and display verified customer reviews on our website, and our recent experience with their moderation team has seriously made us question why we pay for the service. A customer posted a negative review containing multiple statements that are demonstrably false. These weren't differences of opinion or a customer simply being unhappy with their experience. They were specific factual claims that we could disprove with our records. We submitted the review for moderation and provided Reviews.io with the relevant context and evidence. They refused to remove it. We fully expect negative reviews from time to time. That's part of running a business, and legitimate criticism should absolutely remain published. What we don't accept is the idea that a customer should be able to publish objectively false information about a business and that the platform we're paying to manage our reviews won't meaningfully intervene. This creates an incredibly one-sided system. A customer can make damaging claims publicly, while the retailer is left to defend itself underneath the review—even when the retailer can provide documentation showing those claims aren't true. For small businesses, reputation matters enormously. Reviews can directly influence purchasing decisions and search results. A review platform should understand the difference between protecting honest customer criticism and allowing misinformation to remain published simply because it was written by a customer. If Reviews.io's position is essentially that virtually anything a customer writes must remain online regardless of the evidence provided by the retailer, businesses should understand that before choosing them as their review provider. We've been a paying customer, but this experience has us seriously reconsidering that relationship.
Lovella Agustin
Headline: Misleading "5-Year Guarantee" Denied by Hidden Exclusions Review: Do not be fooled by Gardening Express's heavily advertised "5-Year Hardy Plant Guarantee." I bought a Flamingo plant under the impression it was protected, only to have my claim denied due to restrictive exclusion policies. Their customer service makes it incredibly difficult to get a resolution, relying on rigid terms to avoid replacing failed plants. If you buy from them, know that you are completely on your own if the plant dies. Very disappointing service, and I strongly advise potential customers to buy elsewhere.
Mark Russo
signed up with reviews.io for a 7 day trial, we cancelled 48 hours before trial expiring as system will not work on our website platform .....they took a years subscription after we cancelled and said get stuffed with no refund. Our web developer is also cancelling all his and his customer accounts .we have been online for over 25 years and can only describe Reviews .io as a scam
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Laut Impressum
Laut Impressum
Reviews erreicht aktuell 1,5 von 5 Sternen aus 100 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Skalitzer Str 104 1, 0997 Berlin, GB) ist öffentlich dokumentiert. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Reviews im Schnitt mit 1,5 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 100 Bewertungen. 45 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Reviews hat seinen Sitz in Skalitzer Str 104 1, 0997 Berlin, GB. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Bewertungsportal sind Trustpilot (4,2 von 5), Bark (3,6 von 5), Verbund Pflegehilfe (4,8 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von Reviews ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Reviews hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Reviews: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.