Bewertung
1,8
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Unternehmensdienstleistungenretailadr.org.uk
1,8von 5 · Mangelhaft
Bewertung
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Stimmen
6 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Unternehmensdienstleistungen
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Ihre Stimme
Hamza vally
Corporate Shills. They act for retailers. My adjudicator Molly showed clear bias for selfridges. I ran my query through 4 LLMs and all said they believed my case was stronger.
Heidi Orange
After Currys left me with an unsafe, uninstalled fridge freezer and repeatedly misled me about engineer visits that were never booked, I took my complaint to CDRL/RetailADR. I provided a detailed chronology, written correspondence and evidence showing: I had paid for installation which was not carried out. I was told on two separate days to stay at home for visits that literally did not exist in Currys’ system. A Currys staff member falsely claimed their notes showed I had refused access and did not want anyone from Currys near my property – something Currys later admitted was not supported by their own records. Despite this, CDRL concluded that Currys had done nothing wrong and that I effectively had no case. In other words, an ADR scheme that is supposed to provide independent redress looked at an unsafe non‑installation, two wasted days built on misinformation, and a false allegation recorded against me, and still found no meaningful fault on the retailer’s side. The whole process felt one‑sided and opaque. I was required to submit detailed evidence and arguments, but the outcome read as if the bar for criticising the retailer had been set so high that almost nothing would ever qualify. It is very hard to see how an ordinary consumer could look at my case and feel that the decision was fair, balanced or proportionate. CDRL markets itself as an independent body approved to help consumers resolve disputes with retailers. In my experience, it functioned more as another layer of defence for the retailer than as a genuine check on unfair treatment. If you are a consumer considering using this scheme, be aware that it may consume a lot of time and energy for very little prospect of meaningful redress, even in cases where the retailer has already admitted serious failings.
Oliver Collyer
Merchant biased.
David Proctor
Claim with IKEA. Spent 8K. Rubbish customer service. ADR supposedly reviewed evidence??? I even demonstrated IKEA defrauding a completion certificate. Secured no more than good will. I didn’t respond within 7 days and they closed the case having had it for 4 months. Useless outfit. Not sure who is worse them or IKEA.
erin Thomson
Omg how are they even allowed to think they help resolve issues when they don’t even fully look into the issue absolute useless and the fact they did not investigate my issue the event and what was involved is ridiculous - no wonder retailers direct u to them as they know u won’t ever win!!
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
RetailADR erreicht aktuell 1,8 von 5 Sternen aus 60 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Company No. 0918, 9773 Wolverton, GB) ist öffentlich dokumentiert. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten RetailADR im Schnitt mit 1,8 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 60 Bewertungen. 6 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
RetailADR hat seinen Sitz in Company No. 0918, 9773 Wolverton, GB. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Unternehmensdienstleistungen sind Bpost (4,2 von 5), VFS Global (4,2 von 5), Too Good To Go (3,6 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Nein. Das Profil von RetailADR ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann RetailADR hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
RetailADR: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.