Bewertung
1,9
Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen
Versorgungsdienstleistungenhpe.com
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Erfahrungen
1,9von 5 · Mangelhaft
Nicht beansprucht Beanspruchen Antwortet blitzschnell
Stimmen
32
3 in den letzten 12 Monaten
Versorgungsdienstleistungen
13%
Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen
Bewertungen (32)
3 in 12 MonatenIhre Stimme
Erfahrung zu Hewlett Packard Enterprise schreiben
Terry Casey
Verifizierte Bewertung
Absolute garbage
Absolute garbage The original Printer they sold me was faulty and the replacement they’ve sent me is also faulty and I’ve wasted over six hours with completely useless technical support and I’m now locked out of my HP account. Absolute garbage.
0
Carlos Alexander Adames
Verifizierte Bewertung
I was laid off and discriminated
I was laid off and discriminated. The people from Aguadilla/San Juan Puerto Rico (peers), USA Massachusetts (product owner) and one dude from India (Manager), decided to ask me to lead an innovation project relating to AI. I accepted and started an interview process with the current subject matter expert, designed and developed a Cognitive AI Agentic system with Memory - Retrieval Augmented Generation, few shot learning and adaptive prompting engineering with Bayesian optimization for the memory system. The short term memory was intended for SKUs, the long term memory was for document version evolution and a separate DB served for context. The data was word docx files, so the justification for the custom ETL was that LangChain does not process Docx and the data needed to be exactly as on the original document that had 4 channels of data containment: images, tables, text and other files (csv, xls, pdf, html, docx, etc). The potential of the project was huge, it could have automated many tasks of the team leading to faster dev time, less re-work before testing due file errors and in the future, overall automated testing for the specific process. In addition to the entire custom AI architecture, a custom data engineering ETL with OCR (ML integration) pipeline was created and Industrial Engineering methods for process improvement was implemented to provide the analysis after meeting with the SME.... The whole project was cut off before reaching the implementation of AIOS for better managing the LLM and non LLM tasks for better efficiency, and before implementation on the cloud. The manager from India admitted that the people of Puerto Rico, and that one product owner from Massachusetts, did not know anything about what I was doing, like not one single thing about AI/ML nor Data... at least this was the excuse, nevertheless, without ANYONE helping me, the manager had the audacity to push for me to deliver. The team seemed like they did not wanted to learn from me, or even talk. Instead of replying my extensive communication via meetings, emails, team chats, or jira, they just decided to ignore me. Even in person, when I talked about the topic (in Puerto Rico), they quickly changed the subject. This is how people try to sabotage smart engineers. The experience that I walked away with was: Puerto Ricans apparently hate AI because they have an inferiority complex due to colonial insularism that ONLY allows them to shake tits, ass, vagina and penis to the lame Bad Bunny music. The claim "There was no communication", was false and the PC can prove it. They wanted "education" yet no one asked nor talked. There was plenty of communication and information shared, they just ignored it. I was extremely underpaid for my role, so I would have been more underpaid in the case of providing education material to the site. They are still trying to find a replacement 3 months later and I guarantee it will be 1.5 - 3 times more expensive than me so the claim of cost reduction will blow up on their face. I assume someone with technical experience will look at the project and laugh, or cry, at the stupid decision of firing the subject matter expert that started this Industrial/Software/Data/ML/AI system after so many story points where invested. Keep this in mind when you read the bull shit of "work life balance" since it only applies to people that seduce others, not for actual engineers. In conclusion, if you have the chance of working on HPE... just don't. If you need to due to economic reasons, DO NOT LEAD PROJECTS NOR GO THE EXTRA MILE IF PUERTO RICANS, PRODUCT OWNERS FROM MASSACHUSETTS OR MANAGERS FROM INDIAN ARE INVOLVED.
0
Nikica
Verifizierte Bewertung
Storeonce
After we sold Storeonce to a customer who HPE had failed to sell anything to for years, after the devices went EOL they sold new Storeonce directly and completely ignored us. They eventually admitted to the dishonest act and promised to compensate in some way, which they have not done to date. Avoid by all means.
0
C. Reeg
Verifizierte Bewertung
Lebenslange Garantie, aber nicht für Privatnutzer.
Am Wochenende ist ein HP ProCurve Switch (Baujahr 2007) kaputt gegangen. 18 Jahre fehlerfreier Betrieb wären eigentlich 4 Sterne wert. Aber der Switch wurde seinerzeit mit Lebenslanger Garantie verkauft. Auch laut HPE Support Center hat er noch bis Juni 2106 Garantie. Beim Versuch die Garantie in Anspruch zu nehmen wurde mir aber gerade erklärt, das der Switch nicht für "personal use" gedacht wäre und ich deshalb keinen Garantieanspruch hätte. Wenn HPE keine Privatnutzer will, werde ich sie in Zukunft meiden.
0
Laura Pacciarella
Verifizierte Bewertung
Nessun essere umano al telefono
Ho chiesto assistenza, ho ricevuto un numero da digitare su Whatsapp e non mi sono subito resa conto che parlavo con Hal, un robot apparentemente umano. Ho persino temuto di essere caduta in una trappola informatica. E' stata un'esperienza umiliante oltre a una notevole perdita di tempo. State lontani dal numero Whatsapp +39 02 38582377.
0
Die Akte
Antwortet blitzschnell
Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Alternativen zu Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Versorgungsdienstleistungen-Ranking →Häufige Fragen zu Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Ist Hewlett Packard Enterprise seriös?
Hewlett Packard Enterprise erreicht aktuell 1,9 von 5 Sternen aus 32 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Borsigstr. 13, 40880 Ratingen, IE) ist öffentlich dokumentiert, Kontaktdaten liegen offen. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.
Wie bewerten Kunden Hewlett Packard Enterprise?
Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Hewlett Packard Enterprise im Schnitt mit 1,9 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 32 Bewertungen. 3 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.
Wo hat Hewlett Packard Enterprise seinen Sitz?
Hewlett Packard Enterprise hat seinen Sitz in Borsigstr. 13, 40880 Ratingen, IE. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.
Welche Alternativen zu Hewlett Packard Enterprise gibt es?
Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Versorgungsdienstleistungen sind T-Mobile (1,4 von 5), Innova Energie (4,3 von 5), Brunata (4,2 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.
Ist das Profil von Hewlett Packard Enterprise beansprucht?
Nein. Das Profil von Hewlett Packard Enterprise ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Hewlett Packard Enterprise hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.
Antwortet Hewlett Packard Enterprise auf Bewertungen?
Hewlett Packard Enterprise: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.
Kann Hewlett Packard Enterprise negative Bewertungen löschen lassen?
Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.
Wir löschen keine Bewertungen.
Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.