Forschung und Produktentwicklungappen.com

Appen Erfahrungen

1,6von 5 · Mangelhaft

269 Bewertungen

Nicht beansprucht Beanspruchen Antwortet blitzschnell

Bewertung

1,6

Mangelhaft · von 5 Sternen

Stimmen

269

25 in den letzten 12 Monaten

Forschung und Produktentwicklung

9%

Anteil 5-Sterne-Bewertungen

Bewertungen (269)

25 in 12 Monaten

Ihre Stimme

Erfahrung zu Appen schreiben

Sterne wählen

Kein Konto nötig zum Schreiben — dauert unter einer Minute.

Massimiliano Panebianco

US · 4. August 2026

Verifizierte Bewertung

CrowdGen / Appen doesn't pay freelancers

I am wUnpaid labor and unfair account termination on Project Sirius (CrowdGen / Appen)riting to publicly report and… I am writing to publicly report and contest the unfair practices of CrowdGen Team and Sirius Support Team. After successfully passing the mandatory qualification test with full accuracy and carefully studying all project guidelines and compliance rules, I completed 20 tasks for Project Sirius on the CrowdGen platform. Despite fulfilling all instructions with utmost care and professionalism, the Sirius Support Team abruptly terminated my access, falsely claiming issues with service level agreements, and arbitrarily removed my 20 completed tasks from the dataset, refusing to pay for the work performed. When turning to the CrowdGen Support Team for assistance, I was met with an automated rejection stating they take no responsibility and cannot reverse project-level decisions, effectively washing their hands of any accountability regarding unpaid compensation. The Issue: Arbitrarily stripping contributors of their earnings under opaque pretexts after the work has been fully submitted. The Proof: All documentation, including the passed tests, completed task counts, and evasive support responses, has been fully recorded and attached. This is a clear case of uncompensated labor and lack of corporate accountability. I demand the immediate review of my account, the full restoration of my 20 completed units, and proper processing for invoicing. Future contributors and clients should be fully aware of how completed work is being handled here. I possess official screenshots from both CrowdGen and Sirius Support explicitly stating my tasks will be deleted and unpaid, alongside full documentation of my 100% passed qualification tests and completed guidelines. These verifiable proofs are ready to be publicly attached to fully expose this unfair treatment. Sincerely Massimiliano Panebianco

0

4. August 2026

Massimiliano Panebianco

US · 26. Juli 2026

Verifizierte Bewertung

I am wUnpaid labor and unfair account termination on Project Sirius (CrowdGen / Appen)riting to publicly report and…

I am writing to publicly report and contest the unfair practices of CrowdGen Team and Sirius Support Team. After successfully passing the mandatory qualification test with full accuracy and carefully studying all project guidelines and compliance rules, I completed 20 tasks for Project Sirius on the CrowdGen platform. Despite fulfilling all instructions with utmost care and professionalism, the Sirius Support Team abruptly terminated my access, falsely claiming issues with service level agreements, and arbitrarily removed my 20 completed tasks from the dataset, refusing to pay for the work performed. When turning to the CrowdGen Support Team for assistance, I was met with an automated rejection stating they take no responsibility and cannot reverse project-level decisions, effectively washing their hands of any accountability regarding unpaid compensation. The Issue: Arbitrarily stripping contributors of their earnings under opaque pretexts after the work has been fully submitted. The Proof: All documentation, including the passed tests, completed task counts, and evasive support responses, has been fully recorded and attached. This is a clear case of uncompensated labor and lack of corporate accountability. I demand the immediate review of my account, the full restoration of my 20 completed units, and proper processing for invoicing. Future contributors and clients should be fully aware of how completed work is being handled here. I possess official screenshots from both CrowdGen and Sirius Support explicitly stating my tasks will be deleted and unpaid, alongside full documentation of my 100% passed qualification tests and completed guidelines. These verifiable proofs are ready to be publicly attached to fully expose this unfair treatment. Sincerely Massimiliano Panebianco

0

26. Juli 2026

Donald Adams

US · 20. Juli 2026

Verifizierte Bewertung

I am incredibly frustrated with my…

I am incredibly frustrated with my experience as a contributor for Appen. While working on a recent project, their submission platform experienced persistent technical issues that prevented my completed work from registering correctly. I attempted to reach out for assistance, but it is nearly impossible to get a live support agent to address active platform errors. Instead of fixing the issue or offering support, the management team simply sent a notice stating my dataset was "incomplete" and denied my eligibility for the project invoice. Penalizing contractors for the company's own platform failures is completely unprofessional. With a background in Business Management, I expect a basic level of accountability and functional tools when collaborating with an organization. If you are considering working for them, be aware that you may not be compensated if their system glitches, and you will likely be left without any live technical support to help you resolve it.

0

20. Juli 2026

Yevhenii Nohin

US · 12. Juli 2026

Verifizierte Bewertung

Completed work, received zero payment

I completed transcription tasks in February 2026 under contract via Upwork. Despite completing all assigned work, I received zero payment. After contacting Appen support twice and messaging the contract manager multiple times over 3 months, I received only one automated response saying they were "checking with the team." No payment, no explanation, no follow-up. The payment structure is based on their internal platform, not Upwork escrow — meaning Upwork cannot protect you. This appears to be a deliberate system, not an isolated incident, as many other freelancers report identical experiences. Avoid working for Appen unless payment is guaranteed through a protected escrow system. UPDATE (July 2026): After 6 months of waiting and multiple follow-ups, the payment was finally processed. While I appreciate that Appen ultimately resolved the issue, the experience required significant persistence on my part. Freelancers should be aware that payments may be delayed and proactive follow-up is essential.

0

12. Juli 2026

Elham Abdelfattah

US · 12. Juni 2026

Verifizierte Bewertung

Based on my personal experience

Based on my personal experience, I would not recommend Appen to professional translators or interpreters. They appeared welcoming and responsive. However, after a while, the assignments were offered at rates far below standard. When you are trapped and accept the job, concerns are raised at a late stage, on purpose, to avoid paying. This creates the impression that quality-related objections are being used in a manner that is not transparent.

0

12. Juni 2026

Die Akte

Antwortet blitzschnell

Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.

Alternativen zu Appen

Forschung und Produktentwicklung-Ranking →

Häufige Fragen zu Appen

Ist Appen seriös?

Appen erreicht aktuell 1,6 von 5 Sternen aus 269 unabhängigen Bewertungen — Gesamturteil „Mangelhaft“. Zur Einordnung: der Firmensitz (Help Street 9, 2067 Chatswood, US) ist öffentlich dokumentiert. Alle Stimmen bleiben öffentlich: erfahrungen.app löscht keine Bewertungen gegen Geld.

Wie bewerten Kunden Appen?

Kundinnen und Kunden bewerten Appen im Schnitt mit 1,6 von 5 Sternen („Mangelhaft“) auf Basis von 269 Bewertungen. 25 davon stammen aus den letzten 12 Monaten.

Wo hat Appen seinen Sitz?

Appen hat seinen Sitz in Help Street 9, 2067 Chatswood, US. Die Angabe stammt aus öffentlichen Quellen und dem Impressum.

Welche Alternativen zu Appen gibt es?

Die bestbewerteten Anbieter in der Branche Forschung und Produktentwicklung sind Repello (4,1 von 5), Ozoneair (4,3 von 5), Opiniemeters (4,3 von 5). Das vollständige Ranking mit allen Anbietern finden Sie in der Branchenübersicht auf erfahrungen.app.

Ist das Profil von Appen beansprucht?

Nein. Das Profil von Appen ist öffentlich, aber nicht vom Unternehmen beansprucht. Deshalb kann Appen hier nicht auf Bewertungen antworten. Die Firma kann das Profil kostenlos beanspruchen.

Antwortet Appen auf Bewertungen?

Appen: Antwortet blitzschnell. Typische Antwortzeit unter 24 Stunden.

Kann Appen negative Bewertungen löschen lassen?

Nein. erfahrungen.app löscht, versteckt oder verkauft keine Bewertungen — auch nicht für verifizierte Unternehmen. Firmen können öffentlich antworten, aber Kritik bleibt stehen.

Wir löschen keine Bewertungen.

Auch nicht für Geld. Unclaimed ist fair. Claimed gibt das Mikrofon — nicht den Radiergummi.